Legal Opinion
465 Greenwich Street Associates, Inc. v. Schmidt
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
opinion of the court
William P. McCooe, J.
Defendant tenants are moving to reargue the granting of plaintiff landlord’s motion for summary judgment in an ejectment action. The basis for reargument is that subsequent to this court’s granting the motion the Legislature enacted the “Loft Law” which is controlling and mandates a denial of the motion. The motion for reargument is converted to a motion for renewal since reargument is an improper vehicle when the predicate for relief is a new ground (2A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par *632221.03). The motion for renewal is granted and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- I. L. F. Y. Co. v. Temporary State Housing Rent CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Whitmarsh v. FarnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- People ex rel. Rayland Realty Co. v. FaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- I. L. F. Y. Co. v. City Rent & Rehabilitation AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- People Ex Rel. Rayland Realty Company, Inc. v. . FaganNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lipkis v. PikusCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- Spring Realty Co. v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Audrey v. 12 West 27th Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Lipkis v. PikusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984