Legal Opinion

Powell v. Seay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1976No. 48856Published

1Opinion of the Court

553 P.2d 161 (1976)

Roy B. POWELL, Petitioner,

v.

Frank H. SEAY, District Judge of the District Court of Seminole County, Wewoka Division, Oklahoma, Respondent.

No. 48856.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

February 24, 1976.

Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing July 27, 1976.

Roy B. Powell, pro se.

Jack A. Mattingly, James E. Driscoll, Seminole, for respondent.

BERRY, Justice:

This is original proceeding commenced by Roy B. Powell, District Attorney of Seminole County. Petitioner seeks writ of prohibition against respondent, Hon. Frank H. Seay as District Judge of District Court of Seminole County, Wewoka…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. William J. Bauers, Jr. v. Herbert T. Heisel, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API