Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. Immedia, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 16, 2019No. Civil Action No. 13-cv-00327-CMA-KLMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Franklyn Jenkins's Trial Brief (Doc. # 389), Defendant Immedia Inc.'s Brief Re: Savage Rule (Doc. # 397), and Immedia's Trial Brief (Doc # 399.) Throughout the course of this litigation, the parties have expended substantial resources, time, and effort addressing the issue of whether and how the Savage rule applies to this case. Both parties agree that Minnesota law governs Plaintiff's claims against Immedia. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds that the Savage rule does not apply to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stuart v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Cal. ex rel. Dept. of Transportation v. Herc Rentals, IncCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- Tiffany Smith, et al. v. Tower Extrusions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2026