Legal Opinion

Modern Industrial Bank v. Woodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contract action to enforce the pur*1020chase by the defendants of certain stock in the event that a certain note was not paid to the plaintiff on its due date. The defendants in their answer asserted that their respective alleged contracts had .been subjected to unauthorized material alterations which discharged them from their obligations. Order of the Appellate Term and judgments of the City Court reversed on the law and the facts, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants in the sum- of $1,200, with interest from September 5,1940, with costs in all courts. The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Jaybert Esso Service Station, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. Koehne v. HarveyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Perpignan v. First Franklin Financial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API