Legal Opinion

Lilly v. Prudential Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 2, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MENZA, J.S.C.

Each party moves for summary judgment.

The question presented in this case is whether personal injury protection (PIP) benefits can be denied to an owner of an uninsured operable automobile which had not been operated and had been placed in storage by its owner prior to the accident.

There are no cases which have addressed this issue.

On June 9, 1988, plaintiff sustained injuries in an automobile accident which occurred when she was operating an automobile owned by her cousin and insured by the defendant, Prudential. *359At the time of the accident, plaintiff was the owner of an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Butler v. Bonner & Barnewall, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Fellippello v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  3. Caldwell v. KlineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. BryanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  2. Lilly v. Prudential InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API