Legal Opinion

Trousdale v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKiNNey

Plaintiffs in error were jointly indicted and convicted of carrying burglarious instruments, in violation of section 10918 of the Code, which is as follows:

“Any person who carries concealed about the person any false or skeleton keys, jimmies, or any article of the kind intended for effecting secret entrance into houses, for the purpose of committing theft, or other violations of the law, is guilty of a felony, and, upon conviction, shall be sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for a period of not less than one nor more than ten years.”

The maximum punishment of plaintiffs in error was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Diffey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duchac v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. NesbitTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. BakerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  4. Shafer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Fairbanks v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API