Legal Opinion

Johnson v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 2004No. 03-CT-1016PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant was charged by information with indecent exposure. In this interlocutory appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the information.

During a search incident to his arrest for indecent exposure, the police recovered a small bag of marijuana from appellant’s pocket. The United States Attorney (on behalf of the United States) charged appellant with possession of marijuana, and the Corporation Counsel (on behalf of the District of Columbia) charged him with inde cent exposure. 1 The prosecutions were not joined.

Appellant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. United States v. McMillianDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. In Re BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Glasgow, Jr. v. Camanne Mgmt.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API