Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Howe

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 12, 1901No. 333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Per curiam

This is a suit by assignees in tbe interest of creditors against Lemuel R. Howe, who, it is claimed, was a stockholder in a Maine corporation, and who, it is admitted, had not paid in the full amount of his stock. One important question below was whether the defendant was a stockholder, within the meaning of the statute, and liable for its debj:s. Under the evidence, as shown by the record, we think it was a question for the jury, under instruction, whether Howe was a stockholder under such circumstances as to make him liable under the statute. This court decided, in effect, in Houghton v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houghton v. HubbellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899
  2. Ellis v. MarshallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  3. Mudgett v. HorrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Stanley v. StanleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1846
  5. Barron v. BurrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. American Alkali Co. v. KurtzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Fell v. Securities Co. of North AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API