Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Meadows

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 30, 2006No. S05A1792PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Chief Justice.

In this habeas action, we granted an application for certificate of probable cause to consider whether a sentencing court’s oral warning to a defendant of the consequences of violating a special condition of probation substantially complies with the statutory requirement of OCGA § 42-8-34.1 (a) (2) that the sentencing court give the warning in writing in the court’s sentence. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that an oral warning does not substantially comply with the statute.

1. In 1998, Harvey pled guilty to theft by taking and was sentenced to ten years in prison…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Electric Credit Corp. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. Manville v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Chatman v. FindleySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. Banker v. ColeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jayko v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. Conley v. PateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Conley v. PateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. Sierra Craft, Inc. v. T. D. Farrell Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Jowers v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API