Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. Toto (In Re Toto)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:
The issues in these adversary proceedings, which were consolidated for trial, are whether the mortgagees are entitled to relief from the automatic stay imposed by section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”). We conclude that the mortgagees are entitled to such relief because we find that the respective debtors have no equity in the properties in question and because the mortgagees’ interests in the subject properties are not otherwise adequately protected.
The facts of the instant cases are as follows: 1 Two parcels of real estate located in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vlahos v. Pitts (In Re Pitts)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1979
- North East Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Mikole Developers, Inc. (In Re Mikole Developers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Boulevard Mortgage Co. v. Hinkle (In Re Hinkle)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth School Employees' Retirement Fund v. Heath (Heath)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Miners National Bank of Pottsville v. Schramm (In Re Schramm)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Cynthia WARD, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of BOWEST CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- In Re PolzinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- Peninsula Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. R & H Investment Co. (In Re R & H Investment Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1985