Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Lamanna

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 16, 2001No. 4:00 CV 1422, 4:01 CV 774Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ECONOMUS, District Judge.

This matter is- before the Court upon Petitioner’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”), filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on June 7, 2000(Dkt.# 1). The government filed Defendant’s Reply to the Petition (“Defs.’ Reply Pet.”) on September 13, 2000 (Dkt.# 7); the Defendant’s Supplemental Reply to the Petition on November 8, 2000 (Dkt.# 8); Federal Respondents’ Status Report and Supplemental Response on January 11, 2001(Dkt.# 7); and Respondents’ Response on April 5, 2001 (Dkt.# 12). Petitioner also filed a Petition for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Firooz JaliliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Leonard Louis Capaldi v. Stephen Pontesso, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Robert Louis Farkas v. United States of America, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API