Legal Opinion

Butler v. Milner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1915No. 19,468PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Clark district court; Gordon L. Finley, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

F. L. Goodnight traded an automobile to G. C. Butler for a livery barn in Englewood, which barn was subject to a mortgage for $1600. Nothing was said in the course of the trade about the assumption of *464the mortgage by Goodnight. Cecil W. Newby, the local banker and notary, and who acted as scrivener, was correctly advised of the trade, but of his own volition incorporated in the deed a clause as follows:

“This deed is given subject to a mortgage of $1,600 given in favor of Marion Forsher, which mortgage said party of the second part agrees to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morgan v. FieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Butler v. MilnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Proctor Trust Co. v. NeihartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Federal Land Bank v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Guarantee Mortgage & Finance Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Benson-Stabeck Co. v. Farmers' Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API