Legal Opinion

Carr v. Stencel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1936No. Docket No. 38, Calendar No. 39,117PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

Tbe receiver of the plaintiff bank filed this bill in equity to obtain an accounting and for a decree requiring payment of a note held by the bank against defendant Stencel. The note in question was secured by a chattel mortgage. It was given December 8, 1932, for $500 payable April 8, 1933. On the same date another note for $1,600 due August 8, 1933, was given by Stencel to Harry J. Holbrook, trustee. Payment of this note was secured by the same chattel mortgage. Also on the same date a third note in the principal sum of $1,110, payment of which was secured by the chattel mortgage, was given…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Anderson v. EngardMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. English v. CarneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Jennings v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Wales v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scherk v. NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API