Department of Revenue ex rel. Welshans v. Pericola
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1ConcurrenceW. Sharp, Judge
I concur with Judge Peterson’s opinion in the case, but write simply to clarify the rationale, as I see it. The Department of Revenue has been subrogated to the rights of the support. obligee to the extent public assistance payments have been made to, or for the benefit of a dependent child. § 409.2561, Fla.Stat. (1993); Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Prince, 601 So.2d 588 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). With regard to those payments, it is not bound by any judgment to which it was not a party, nor any stipulation it did not join in. However, the amount of reimbursement to which the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dept. of Health & Rehab. Services v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. HatfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. PrinceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992