Legal Opinion

Roof v. Rule

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1932No. 21062. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Mason county ordering partition of certain real estate.

On July 18, 1862, Pollard Simmons was seized of the property in question. The bill alleges that on said date he conveyed it to his daughter, Harriet E. Rule, and her bodily heirs, "as by the said deed when produced and by a certified copy of the same hereto attached and marked 'Exhibit A' and made a part of this bill for greater certainty will more fully appear." The premises of "Exhibit A" read as follows: "This indenture, made this eighteenth day of July in the year of our Lord one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wollenberger v. HooverIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Armstrong v. Douglas Park Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Nave v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Fisher v. BurksIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. GrubbIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Kempski v. HisgenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. Leffers v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  4. Barker v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Kent v. Morris Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API