Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Walsh

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 10, 1975No. 180-74PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Testatrix’ adopted son appealed to the Rutland Superior Court from the allowance by the Rutland Probate Court of an instrument purporting to be her last will and testament, and a subsequent codicil thereto changing the named executors. By jury verdict, and judgment thereon, the instruments were respectively found to be not her last will or a codicil thereto. Notice of appeal to this Court was seasonably filed by the executors named in the purported codicil, but by no other parties. Concededly, the appellants’ only interest in the estate is as executors.

Despite varying views on this question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of GaskellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  2. Simonds v. Simonds' EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cooperative Fire Ins. Ass'n v. BizonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. In re M.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API