State v. Mulkern
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On exceptions. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtVirgin, J.
In the trial of one indicted for the crime of rape the prosecutrix is allowed to testify that she, subsequently to the commission of the offense, made complaint of the injury; she cannot enter into its details. This practice is permissible upon the grounds that it tends more or less to corroborate her testimony as to the alleged crime. Mere lapse of time between the perpetration of the act and the complaint is not the test of its admissibility. The time that intervenes is a subject for the jury to consider in passing upon the weight of her testimony ; and the degree of credit to be given it…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- State of Maine v. John A. FahnleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- State v. BebbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- State v. FriddlesOregon Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.