Legal Opinion

Guy v. City of San Diego

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 17, 2010No. 08-56024PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge GOULD; Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON.

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Anthony Guy appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial on damages following a jury verdict that was reached in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The jury concluded that police officer David Maley used excessive force when he detained Guy during a late-night confrontation, but the jury awarded only nominal damages, and that prompts Guy’s appeal seeking a new trial solely on damages. Guy also appeals the district court’s decision not to award him attorney’s fees and nontaxable costs as the prevailing party…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Juan Manuel Morales v. City of San Rafael and Daniel HulettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Sergio Ramirez v. Transunion LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
  4. Barry Hazle, Jr. v. Mitch CrofootCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Seungtae Kim v. BMW Financial Services NADistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API