Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1996No. 93-CO-124, 94-CO-74 and 94-CO-75PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WAGNER, Chief Judge.

Having been found not guilty by reason of insanity of various criminal offenses, both appellants, James L. Brown and John R. Marlowe, were committed for hospitalization at St. Elizabeths Hospital pursuant to D.C.Code § 24 — 301(d) (1996). Appellants’ principal argument on appeal is that they were deprived of their liberty without due process when returned for inpatient hospitalization following their court-ordered conditional release without being accorded the notification and hearing procedures established for civil committees in In re Richardson, 481 A.2d 473 (D.C.1984).…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API