Wild Rice Lumber Co. v. Royal Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Norman county to recover from each, of the eleven defendants upon their several policies of tíre insurance-the proportionate share due from each. The case was tried beforeGrindeland, J., who found in favor of plaintiff and against defendants for the aggregate sum of $233.94. From a judgment entered, pursuant to the findings, both parties appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The Wild Rice Lumber Company was the proprietor oí a sawmill and lumber yard situated in the village of Ada. During the year 1904 certain insurance companies issued policies agreeing to indemnify the lumber company from loss by fire upon the lumber described therein. The policies were all in the form prescribed by chapter 175, p. 417, Laws 1895, as amended by chapter 254, p. 468, Laws 1897. So far as at present material, the policies were identical in form and contained the following description of the property insured.
On lumber (pickets, posts, timber, lath, and shingles, if any) owned by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kollitz v. Equitable Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Coleman v. Retail Lumbermen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Heim v. American Alliance Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Vermes Credit Jewelry, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Moore v. Sun Insurance OfficeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Queen Insurance v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.