Commonwealth v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The Court being equally divided the judgments of sentence remain in effect.
O’BRIEN, J., files an opinion in support of affirmance which is joined by EAGEN, C. J., and LARSEN, J. ROBERTS, J., files an opinion in support of reversal which is joined by MANDERINO, J. NIX, J., files an opinion in support of reversal which is joined by MANDERINO, J.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF REVERSAL
ROBERTS, Justice.
The Opinion in Support of Affirmance holds that objections cannot be raised to a court’s charge given in response to a jury request during its deliberations for further instructions where…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. RouxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. LaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.