Legal Opinion

Mixon v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 12, 1997No. CR 97-452PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, Clarence Mixon, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, John F. Stroud III, states that the notice of appeal was filed prior to the entry of the judgment and commitment order. Thus, under rules, the notice of appeal was of no effect. See Profit v. State, 326 Ark. 825, 933 S.W.2d 392 (1996). However, because counsel does not admit fault for filing the notice of appeal prematurely, we deny the motion.

If the attorney will concede by affidavit that it was his fault that the notice of appeal was prematurely filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harkness v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Profit v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Mixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API