Simpson v. Gowdy
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
One Thomasson was indebted to Gowdy and Terry, and several other persons. Arthur J. Simpson, Fsq., was the attorney for the larger'portion of these creditors, and John Baker, Fsq., for the residue; and the claims of the creditors against Thomasson were in the hands of these attorneys for collection.
Thomasson being unable to pay the cash, assigned property to these creditors, deemed sufficient to produce a fund equal to. the aggregate of the debts. The property consisted of dry goods, etc., was accepted by the creditors, and placed in the hands of their said attorneys, who undertook to dispose…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bennett v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Sluss v. ShrewsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. ReederIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Ludington's PetitionNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1878