Legal Opinion

Nash v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 23, 1930No. 12268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for swindling; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

Having concluded that our former opinion was not correct, same is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor:

We think the indictment sufficient, and that the motion to quash same was properly overruled. Same alleged that the property described therein, to-wit; a cashier’s check for $2690.82, was obtained by appellant by means of false pretenses, devices and acts, and fraudulent representations made by him to Mr. Trantham, cashier of a bank, namely, by drawing and presenting a draft, which is copied in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Escue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Parten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API