Legal Opinion

People v. Van Etten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The circumstantial evidence was legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for attempted burglary in the second degree. Defendant’s presence in the fenced-in back yard of the residence, standing at a bedroom window with one hand on the sill and the other on the partially open portion of the window, constituted conduct dangerously close to commission of the ultimate crime of burglary (see, People v King, 61 NY2d 550). Defendant never knocked on a door or rang a door bell. When observed at the *977bedroom window, he asked directions to a street…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. GILMER, TEDDERICK A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. People v. GilmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API