Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Barnard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1929No. 27,029Published

1ConcurrenceHilton, J.

I concur in an affirmance but think that defendant’s offer of proof as to character should have been granted. One who “observes and obeys the laws,” in other words, is a law-abiding citizen, should be permitted to show it when on trial charged with the commission of a crime. State v. Lee, 22 Minn. 407, 21 Am. R. 769; State v. Humphrey, 173 Minn. 410, 217 N. W. 373.

The officer making the arrest testified that he found a loaded revolver in defendant’s car. This was denied by defendant. The opinion, on the authority of the cases therein cited, states that evidence as to good disposition as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  3. State v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API