Legal Opinion

Force v. Republic of Sudan

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 19, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2020-3027Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STUART FORCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-3027 (RDM) REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case arises from a series of terrorist attacks carried out in Israel between 2014 and 2018. See Dkt. 7 at 22–54 (Compl. ¶¶ 96–277). Plaintiffs are victims, family members of victims, and the estates of victims of these attacks. Id. Plaintiffs allege that two terrorist organizations—Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (“PIJ”)—perpetrated the attacks that caused their injuries. Plaintiffs commenced this action…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API