Legal Opinion

General Storage Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1991No. 90-2664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied based upon the respondent’s concession, which we accept, that any factual determinations made in the non-jury mortgage foreclosure action will have no res judicata or collateral estoppel effect as to any of the issues to be determined by the jury on the petitioners’ third-party complaint against the FDIC as receiver. See McGregor v. Provident Trust Co., 119 Fla. 718, 733, 162 So. 323, 329 (1935); Couch Constr. Co. v. Florida Dep't of Transp., 537 So.2d 631, 632 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), rev. denied, 545 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1989); Restatement (Second) of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Harold v. Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. McGregor v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. La Rambla Shopping Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  5. Trigo v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Fdic)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. RDJ Enterprises, Inc. v. Mega BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API