General Storage Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied based upon the respondent’s concession, which we accept, that any factual determinations made in the non-jury mortgage foreclosure action will have no res judicata or collateral estoppel effect as to any of the issues to be determined by the jury on the petitioners’ third-party complaint against the FDIC as receiver. See McGregor v. Provident Trust Co., 119 Fla. 718, 733, 162 So. 323, 329 (1935); Couch Constr. Co. v. Florida Dep't of Transp., 537 So.2d 631, 632 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), rev. denied, 545 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1989); Restatement (Second) of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harold v. Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- McGregor v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. La Rambla Shopping Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Trigo v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Fdic)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- RDJ Enterprises, Inc. v. Mega BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992