Legal Opinion

Davis v. Plunkett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 2, 1960No. 41,961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

As between the parties to this appeal, this was an action to quiet title. The question presented involves the construction of a “Mining Lease” covering eighty acres of land in Meade county, which reads as follows:

“Belle Davis J ,,. .,,. . To I Mining

Volcanic Ash Company J Lease

“Contract and Agreement, Made and entered into this 3rd day of May, 1926, by and between Belle Davis, a widow, of Meade County, Kansas, party of the first part and The Volcanic Ash Company of America, a Missouri corporation, party of the second part;
“Witnesseth, That…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hans v. Great Bend Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wulf v. ShultzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Guild TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Keller v. ElySupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Amoco Production Company v. Guild TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Wanna E. Bumpus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API