Legal Opinion
Davis v. Plunkett
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 2, 1960No. 41,961PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Price, J.:
As between the parties to this appeal, this was an action to quiet title. The question presented involves the construction of a “Mining Lease” covering eighty acres of land in Meade county, which reads as follows:
“Belle Davis J ,,. .,,. . To I Mining
Volcanic Ash Company J Lease
“Contract and Agreement, Made and entered into this 3rd day of May, 1926, by and between Belle Davis, a widow, of Meade County, Kansas, party of the first part and The Volcanic Ash Company of America, a Missouri corporation, party of the second part;
“Witnesseth, That…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hans v. Great Bend Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wulf v. ShultzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Amoco Production Co. v. Guild TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Keller v. ElySupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Amoco Production Company v. Guild TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Wanna E. Bumpus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.