Legal Opinion
Lalangan v. Pennington
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 18, 2022No. 4:20-cv-00292Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Ireno Lalangan, No. CV-20-00292-TUC-JCH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Greg Pennington, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (“Motion”). (Doc. 39.) 16 For the following reasons, the Court denies the Motion. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 On July 7, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Greg Pennington and Jane Doe 19 Pennington, dba Penn-Tek alleging, inter alia, breach of contract. (Doc. 1.) On July 31, 20 2020, Defendant Greg Pennington, pro se, filed an answer and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.