Rosenbaum v. Howard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff; from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Moer, J., denying his motion for a new trial after a verdict for defendant J. G-. Howard.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
The plaintiff, between July 1 and December 1,1895, sold merchandise to the value of $2,640 to the firm of Howard & Haynie, then retail merchants at Duluth. This action was brought against the defendants to recover therefor, on the ground that they were the individual members of such partnership. The defendant J. G. Howard answered separately, putting in issue all of the allegations of the complaint. The plaintiff on the trial claimed that J. Gr. Howard was in fact a member of the firm of Howard & Haynie, and also that he held himself out to be such partner, and that the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fountain v. MenardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Robins v. WardeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Martin v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cobb v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Frye v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Pump-It, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Minnesota Debenture Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Foot, Schulze & Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.