Breen v. Breen
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
1. While a judgment for permanent alimony, based upon the agreement of the parties, which judgment was not excepted to and contains no reservation of jurisdiction for the purpose of later modifying the same, passes beyond the discretionary control of the trial judge, and he has no authority thereafter to modify the terms of such judgment (Coffee v. Coffee, 101 Ga. 787, 28 S. E. 977; Wilkins v. Wilkins, 146 Ga. 382, 91 S. E. 415)—yet, where such judgment for permanent alimony is based upon an agreement of the parties, and both the agreement, which is made the judgment of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coffee v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Wilkins v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Estes v. EstesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Hardy v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Chandler v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goodloe v. GoodloeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Roberts v. MandevilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Zuber v. ZuberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Fricks v. FricksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.