MATTER OF MULVANEY v. Dubin
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the petition dismissed.
The Appellate Division should have dismissed the petition for article 78 relief, in the nature of prohibition, to prevent Supreme Court from requiring defendant to give the prosecution a written report of his examination by a court-appointed psychiatrist. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition lies only where a court “acts or threatens to act without jurisdiction in a matter over which it has no power over the subject matter or where it exceeds its authorized…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. DalyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. MirandaNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Feretich v. Parsons HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. FrattNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Rossettie ex rel. Young v. FinnertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.