Legal Opinion

Rush Township School District v. Titus

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County

Decided December 7, 1925No. 5Published

1Opinion of the Court

Berger, J.,

The defendants were restrained by preliminary injunction from entering into or using the Leibig .school-house No. 2, the property of the plaintiff, and from interfering with the possession, management, control and care of the same. The preliminary injunction, was continued by agreement of the parties until final hearing. No answer having been filed within thirty days from the service of the bill, a decree pro confesso was entered Nov. 9, 1925. The facts stated in the bill are, therefore, presumed to be true, and the duty is now upon the court to make the appropriate findings and to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tide Water Pipe Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Walters v. McElroySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Real Estate Trust Co. v. HattonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. McGonigle v. Saint Clair Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API