Legal Opinion
Bastoe v. Burger King Distribution Srv.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 19, 1997No. Nos. 96-CA-0021 to 96-CA-0023PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
liMURRAY, Judge.
Burger King Corporation appeals a ruling by the Office of Workers Compensation that Burger King was not entitled to modify or terminate supplemental earnings benefits to claimant Jack T. Bastoe. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
The parties agree that Mr. Bastoe was injured in the course and scope of his employment with Burger King Distribution Ser*276vices (formerly a division of Burger King) on October 11, 1990, and filed a claim with the Office of Workers Compensation in 1991. A consent judgment was entered into on May 21, 1992, in which it was agreed that Mr. Bastoe was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Freeman v. Poulan/Weed EaterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Daugherty v. Domino's PizzaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Reed v. Direct InstallersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Fortune v. Charbonnet-Labat Funeral HomeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doane v. Omni Royal Orleans HotelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Molinere v. Vinson Guard Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005