Legal Opinion

Dillner Transfer Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 9, 1961No. 188PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

368 U.S. 6 (1961)

DILLNER TRANSFER CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

No. 188.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 9, 1961.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

Ernie Adamson for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

Carl Helmetag, Jr. for the Pennsylvania Railroad Co., and Herbert Baker, John C. Bradley and Roland Rice for Continental Transportation Lines, Inc., et al., intervenors.

2Per curiam

The motions to affirm are granted and the…

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BilboTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. C & H TRANSPORTATION CO.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972
  3. Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. International Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  4. United Transports, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. H. J. Jeffries Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API