Legal Opinion

De’Amontae Manning v. Joshua Mulinix

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 10, 2026No. 3:24-cv-01171Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION DE’AMONTAE MANNING, CASE NO. 3:24 CV 1171 Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JAMES R. KNEPP II JOSHUA MULINIX, Defendant. ORDER Currently pending before the Court in this

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action is pro se Plaintiff De’Amontae Manning’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Doc. 30). In support, Plaintiff contends he is unable to afford counsel, he lacks knowledge of the law, he has limited access to the library and his imprisonment will “greatly limit [his] ability to litigate,” and the issues involved in this case “are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Patrick W. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. MacKey v. DiCaprioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  3. Schultz v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API