State v. Culkin
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion of
ACOBA, J.,
with whom LEVINSON, J. joins.
I believe that juror questions in criminal cases significantly alter the structure of trials and that, on remand, the impact of such questioning should be considered by the trial court. I write separately also to emphasize the widely held view that juror questions are inherently problematic.
In many instances, it is not the question posed or the answer given that is of most importance: it is the fact that the question is asked in the first place. As trial attorneys will grasp, the juror question is, in effect, a direct communication…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Rudolph v. Iowa Methodist Medical CenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- United States v. Dan CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Herbert Marvin FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Mohammad Ajmal, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, Muhammad Afzal and Hassan Sabghat UllahkhanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.