Legal Opinion
Millerman v. Georgia Pacific Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 11, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered December 20, 1994, which denied defendant Rapid-American Corporation’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of plaintiff, the *363party against whom summary judgment is sought, a reasonable trier of fact could find that plaintiff worked in proximity to where defendant’s predecessor’s products were being used, and that he was exposed to asbestos emitted therefrom (see, Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. [Salerno v Garlock Inc.], 212 AD2d 463). Certainly,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re New York City Asbestos LitigationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Reid v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Dielv. Flintkote Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Cawein v. Flintkote Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Salerno v. Garlock Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miller v. Akronchem Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Commisso v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Mariani v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003