Legal Opinion

Joyce & Associates v. Pivirotto

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 1986No. 608PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order imposing sanctions because of defendants’ failure to comply with a discovery order entered by the trial court. Because the sanction order is interlocutory, we quash the appeal.

Joyce & Associates commenced an action to recover the sum of $18,905.00 which was allegedly owed by Anthony J. Pivirotto and Robert Woods, d/b/a Pivirotto and Woods, for accounting services. The named defendants thereafter filed an answer which contained new matter and also a counterclaim. Joyce & Associates then served upon the defendants a set of interrogatories and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. McManus v. Chubb Group of InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Christian v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Fox v. GablerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. In Re Estate of IsraelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. City of Philadelphia v. AgrestaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API