Legal Opinion

Dorman v. City of Jacksonville

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from tlie judgment of the Circuit Court for Duval county. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRandall, C. J.

The appellant commenced an action against the appellee, and alleged in his declaration that he was the owner of a lot in the city of Jacksonville, (an incorporated city in this State,) on the north side of Bay street. That as such incorporated city, it has the power to regulate, improve, alter and extend the streets, to open new streets, and to cause encroachments, obstructions, &c., to be removed, “ making the parties injured by an improvement a just compensation, and charging upon those benefitted a reasonable assessment, to be ascertained in such manner as shall be agreed upon by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thurston v. HancockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  2. Smith Ex Rel. Cushing v. Corporation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Weakly v. Bell & SterlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Pontiac v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Selden v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  3. Burford v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Weir v. Palm Beach CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. Bowden v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API