Anderson v. University of Maryland School of Law

MEMORANDUM

MOTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have filed this pro se action against sixty-nine defendants alleging a conspiracy to deny plaintiffs of their constitutional rights.

Plaintiffs have utterly failed to comply with the requirement of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that they provide “a short and plain statement of ... [their] claim.” Since an enormous amount of paperwork and cost would be involved in issuing process for the sixty-nine defendants, this Court will enter an order sua sponte dismissing the action before service is effected. The dismissal will be without…