Legal Opinion

Fairfaxx Corp. v. Law Audit Services, No. Cv98 35 04 74 (Jul. 9, 1998)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 9, 1998No. CV98 35 04 74Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION REOUEST TO REVISE # 109

The plaintiff has filed a request to revise seeking to delete the defendant's special defense of estoppel on the ground that it is improperly raised as a special defense pursuant to Practice Book § 164, now Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 10-50.

"[T]he rule that requires an estoppel to be specially pleaded . . . is archaic . . . and has not been the law for over a century." (Citation omitted.) Allied Grocers Cooperative, Inc.v. Caplan, 30 Conn. App. 274, 278, 620 A.2d 165…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allied Grocers Cooperative, Inc. v. CaplanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API