In re the Letter Decision of the Committee on Attorney Advertising
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA
This appeal concerns Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 7.5, which governs law firm names in New Jersey, and Alpha Center for Divorce Mediation, P.C. (the Center), an entity that operates in multiple states and consists of lawyers and supportive personnel engaged in divorce mediation services. The Center began operating in New Jersey under the trade name that it uses in other jurisdictions, and an issue arose over whether the Center’s use of its trade name in New Jersey violated RPC 7.5. Ultimately, the Committee on Attorney Advertising (CAA), which opines on such questions in the context of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Friedman v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Public Citizen, Inc. v. Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Review of Opinion 475 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics & DR 2-102(C)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Alexander v. CahillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ESTATE OF RENEE M. BARBUTO VS. BOYD & BOYD (L-0171-16, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- LawHQ, LLC v. CurtinDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2021