Legal Opinion
Kuziel v. Pet Fair, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1996No. 95CA2036PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
In this workers’ compensation proceeding, claimant, Dana Kuziel, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) determining that respondents, Pet Fair, Inc., and the Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority, were not hable for “babysitting services” provided while claimant was hospitalized for surgery to treat the work-related injury to her knee. We affirm.
The facts are undisputed. A hearing was conducted concerning claimant’s petition to reopen and request for temporary disability benefits and medical benefits, at which respondents did not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grover v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. DowneyColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sigman Meat Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hillen v. Tool KingColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Country Squire Kennels v. TarshisColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Winter v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Bellone v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Enterprise v. ICAOColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
- Jones v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2009