Legal Opinion

M.C.S. v. Seattle School District No 1

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 20, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00619Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 M.C.S., in her capacity as parent and CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00619-LK 11 guardian of minor W.B., ORDER ON PETITION FOR 12 Plaintiff, APPOINTMENT OF SETTLEMENT v. GUARDIAN AD LITEM 13 PURSUANT TO FED. SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 1, R. CIV. P. 17 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court upon the Petition of Lara Hruska of Cedar Law 17 PLLC, counsel for Plaintiffs, seeking the appointment of a Settlement Guardian ad Litem for 18 Plaintiff W.B. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17. Dkt.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dionisio v. Dacanay and Reynaldo C. Dacanay, by His Father and Next Friend v. Saturnina Mendoza, Victor P. Mendoza, and Doe Insurance Co. No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Robidoux v. RosengrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Salmeron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Francine M. Neilson v. Colgate-Palmolive Company and Colgate Palmolive S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Nancy Noe, by Her Guardian Ad Litem v. Laurel True, Secretary, Department for Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API