Legal Opinion

Kanevsky v. Taran

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1931No. 28,695Published

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiffs appealed from an adverse judgment entered after the trial before the court without a jury!

The action was to cancel on the ground of usury a $2,000 note and a second mortgage securing the same, after a foreclosure of the mortgage. The loan to plaintiffs was negotiated by defendant Sam Taran. It ran to his mother, defendant Gussie Taran, who assigned the mortgage foreclosure certificate to defendant R & R Finance Company. The loan was for six months. Plaintiffs claimed an illegal exaction of $150 in excess of legal interest and that they received but $1,850. This was denied, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jordan v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Holmes v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API