Kanevsky v. Taran
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Plaintiffs appealed from an adverse judgment entered after the trial before the court without a jury!
The action was to cancel on the ground of usury a $2,000 note and a second mortgage securing the same, after a foreclosure of the mortgage. The loan to plaintiffs was negotiated by defendant Sam Taran. It ran to his mother, defendant Gussie Taran, who assigned the mortgage foreclosure certificate to defendant R & R Finance Company. The loan was for six months. Plaintiffs claimed an illegal exaction of $150 in excess of legal interest and that they received but $1,850. This was denied, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jordan v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Holmes v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893