Legal Opinion

People v. Ross

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The question presented on these appeals is whether the object possessed — in one case a real but inoperable handgun, and in the other a starter’s pistol — is a “toy or imitation pistol or revolver” within the meaning of subdivision g of section 436-5.0 of the New York City Administrative Code.

In Ross, defendant was arrested for possession of a .25 caliber silver-plated Baretta pistol loaded with four rounds of ammunition, and charged with criminal possession of a weapon (Penal Law, § 265.02, subd [4]). When the gun was found to be inoperable because of a faulty firing pin,…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. RiversCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. WilfongAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1990
  3. People v. SimmonsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984
  4. In re Tilar Mc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. In re Tilar Mc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API