Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crawford v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1991No. 20692Published

1Dissent

Mowbray, C. J., with whom Springer, J., joins,

dissenting:

Respectfully, I dissent.

After a jury trial, David Crawford was found guilty of the crimes outlined in the majority opinion. Now, the majority concludes that the district court prejudiced the appellant and that the jury’s verdicts must be rejected. However, for the following reasons, I believe the appellant’s convictions should be affirmed.

BAD ACT TESTIMONY

In general, evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts cannot be admitted at a defendant’s trial to show the defendant acted in conformity therewith. NRS 48.045(2). However, “[t]he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bolden v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Walker v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Porter v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. IzattIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Allan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API