Crawford v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Dissent
Mowbray, C. J., with whom Springer, J., joins,
dissenting:
Respectfully, I dissent.
After a jury trial, David Crawford was found guilty of the crimes outlined in the majority opinion. Now, the majority concludes that the district court prejudiced the appellant and that the jury’s verdicts must be rejected. However, for the following reasons, I believe the appellant’s convictions should be affirmed.
BAD ACT TESTIMONY
In general, evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts cannot be admitted at a defendant’s trial to show the defendant acted in conformity therewith. NRS 48.045(2). However, “[t]he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bolden v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Walker v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Porter v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. IzattIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Allan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.