Legal Opinion
Rynearson v. Ferguson
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 22, 2019No. CASE NO. C17-5531RBLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Rynearson's Renewed Motion for a Preliminary Injunction1 [Dkt. # 44]. Rynearson seeks a declaration that RCW 9.61.260(1)(b) is unconstitutional under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, as made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. In this motion, Rynearson asks this Court to declare 9.61.260(1)(b) facially overbroad and to enjoin the defendants from enforcing this particular section as against him.
Rynearson first filed this motion for a preliminary injunction…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McDowell v. LandrusDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Marshall J. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Yates v. Washington Federation of State Employees, AFSCME Council 28, AFL-CIODistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020